OOQB vs VYM
One+One Nasdaq-100 and Bitcoin ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, OOQB or VYM?
Leverage Strategy against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OOQB | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $696,442.48 | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 13.88% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 4 | 613 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 43.8% | 10.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -53.4% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $7,163 | $11,565Best |
| Fund Family | Volatility Shares, LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Leverage Strategy | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Feb 19, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 153 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. OOQB has data through Apr 10, 2026 and VYM through Sep 10, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 19, 2025 to Apr 10, 2026 (1.1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OOQB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 43.8% compared with 10.4% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.4% for OOQB and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.07. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OOQB charges 0.85% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $4 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OOQB currently yields 13.88% against 2.22% for VYM.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of OOQB and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OOQB or VYM?
OOQB has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $81 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, OOQB or VYM?
OOQB has been the more volatile fund at 43.8% annualized versus 10.4% for VYM. Worst drawdown: OOQB -53.4% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both OOQB and VYM?
OOQB and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.07, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, OOQB or VYM?
OOQB yields 13.88% while VYM yields 2.22%, so OOQB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than OOQB?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.