IVV vs OSCV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Opus Small Cap Value ETF
Which is better, IVV or OSCV?
Large Cap Blend against Small Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. OSCV is less concentrated, with 26.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | OSCV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $660M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.05% |
| Holdings | 508 | 66 |
| YTD Return | +12.70%Best | +11.52% |
| 1Y Return | +19.36%Best | +8.23% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.16%Best | +10.83% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.75%Best | +5.89% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7%Best | 18.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -42.8% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,221Best | $13,313 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 26.6%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Aptus ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Small Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 18, 2018 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 18, 2018 to Sep 8, 2026 (8.1 years).
IVV vs OSCV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs OSCV Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Opus Small Cap Value ETF (OSCV) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +19.36% while OSCV returned +8.23%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.70% versus a gain of 11.52% for OSCV.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.16% per year against +10.83% for OSCV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.75% and +5.89% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.13% annualized vs +6.39%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OSCV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 16.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -42.8% for OSCV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while OSCV charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.05% for OSCV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 504 holdings in IVV and 65 in OSCV, totalling 100.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 65 in OSCV, against full books of 508 and 66.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 61 positions for OSCV that do not appear in our book for IVV (96.8% of the fund), and 493 for IVV that do not appear in OSCV (99.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and OSCV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or OSCV?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while OSCV charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or OSCV?
Over the past year IVV returned +19.36% vs +8.23% for OSCV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), IVV annualized +14.13% vs +6.39% for OSCV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or OSCV?
OSCV has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 16.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs OSCV -42.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and OSCV?
IVV and OSCV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or OSCV?
IVV yields 1.10% while OSCV yields 1.05%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is OSCV better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. OSCV is less concentrated, with 26.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.