IVV vs PDBA
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PDBA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.59% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $307M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 3.17% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 17 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +9.00% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +7.98% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | +13.73% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 10.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -12.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Commodity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 24, 2022 |
IVV vs PDBA Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBA) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while PDBA returned +7.98%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 9.00% for PDBA.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.77% per year against +13.73% for PDBA. Across the full 4-year window we track, PDBA has the edge at +11.56% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.9% for PDBA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -12.4% for PDBA. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.12. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PDBA charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $59 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 3.17% for PDBA.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and PDBA share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PDBA?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PDBA charges 0.59%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or PDBA?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +7.98% for PDBA, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +11.56% for PDBA. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or PDBA?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.9% for PDBA. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PDBA -12.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and PDBA?
IVV and PDBA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.12, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PDBA?
IVV and PDBA share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PDBA?
IVV yields 1.09% while PDBA yields 3.17%, so PDBA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.