IVV vs PMAP
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PMAP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.50% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $5M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 6 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +4.11% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +6.55% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 1.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -1.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | PGIM Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 31, 2025 |
IVV vs PMAP Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April (PMAP) is a ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while PMAP returned +6.55%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 4.11% for PMAP.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 1.2% for PMAP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -1.8% for PMAP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PMAP charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for PMAP.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PMAP?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PMAP charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or PMAP?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +6.55% for PMAP, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +7.08% for PMAP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or PMAP?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 1.2% for PMAP. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PMAP -1.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and PMAP?
IVV and PMAP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PMAP?
IVV yields 1.09% while PMAP yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.