PMAP vs SCHD
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, PMAP or SCHD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PMAP | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 7 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +4.50% | +23.46%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.08% | +27.20%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.16% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.2%Best | 12.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -1.8%Best | -12.7% |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $11,042 | $12,724Best |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 1, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.5 years).
PMAP vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
PMAP vs SCHD Performance
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April (PMAP) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year PMAP returned +6.08% while SCHD returned +27.20%. Year to date, PMAP is up 4.50% versus a gain of 23.46% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.3% compared with 1.2% for PMAP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.8% for PMAP and -12.7% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.26. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PMAP charges 0.50% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $6 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PMAP currently yields 0.00% against 3.00% for SCHD.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PMAP and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PMAP or SCHD?
PMAP has an expense ratio of 0.50% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $44 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PMAP or SCHD?
Over the past year PMAP returned +6.08% vs +27.20% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PMAP annualized +6.83% vs +17.42% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PMAP or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 12.3% annualized versus 1.2% for PMAP. Worst drawdown: PMAP -1.8% vs SCHD -12.7%.
Should I hold both PMAP and SCHD?
PMAP and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.26, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PMAP or SCHD?
PMAP yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than PMAP?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.