IVV vs PTMC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PTMC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $395M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.57% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 401 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +16.85% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +21.50% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | +9.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | +4.17% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 12.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -20.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Pacer ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 11, 2015 |
IVV vs PTMC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while PTMC returned +21.50%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 16.85% for PTMC.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.55% per year against +9.17% for PTMC; over five years the annualized figures are +13.27% and +4.17% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +5.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.3% for PTMC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -20.5% for PTMC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PTMC charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $60 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.57% for PTMC.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and PTMC share 0 holdings out of 536 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PTMC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PTMC charges 0.60%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or PTMC?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +21.50% for PTMC, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +5.60% for PTMC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or PTMC?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.3% for PTMC. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PTMC -20.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and PTMC?
IVV and PTMC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PTMC?
IVV and PTMC share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 536 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PTMC?
IVV yields 1.09% while PTMC yields 1.57%, so PTMC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.