PTMC vs VYM

PTMC vs VYM

Which is better, PTMC or VYM?

Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. PTMC is less concentrated, with 7.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMLess Concentrated: PTMC

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPTMCVYM
Expense Ratio0.60%0.04%Best
AUM$384M$81.6B
Dividend Yield1.61%2.22%
Holdings402613
YTD Return+9.14%+11.71%Best
1Y Return+10.30%+16.24%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+8.05%+17.24%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+2.92%+11.86%Best
Volatility (annualized)12.2%Best14.0%
Max Drawdown-20.5%Best-35.7%
$10,000 over 5 years$11,548$17,514Best
Top 10 Weight7.8%Best26.1%
Fund FamilyPacer ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
InceptionJun 11, 2015Nov 10, 2006

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 12, 2015 to Sep 16, 2026 (11.3 years).

PTMC vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.3 years both funds cover.

PTMC vs VYM Performance

Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PTMC returned +10.30% while VYM returned +16.24%. Year to date, PTMC is up 9.14% versus a gain of 11.71% for VYM.

Over three years, PTMC compounded at +8.05% per year against +17.24% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +2.92% and +11.86% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +9.28% annualized vs +4.92%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.0% compared with 12.2% for PTMC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.5% for PTMC and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PTMC charges 0.60% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $4 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PTMC currently yields 1.61% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

PTMC already in VYM28.9%
VYM already in PTMC4.2%

28.9% of PTMC's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 4.2% of VYM's money is in holdings PTMC also owns.

PTMC and VYM share little of their money.

136 positions in common, counted across the 398 positions we hold weights for in PTMC and 557 in VYM, against full books of 402 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 392 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for PTMC (92.9% of the fund), and 255 for PTMC that do not appear in VYM (67.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PTMCWeight in VYMDifference
RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co.0.55%0.08%0.47%
OVVOvintiv Inc.0.51%0.07%0.44%
PRPermian Resource0.51%0.07%0.44%
EWBCEast West Bancorp, Inc.0.49%0.07%0.42%
RGAReinsurance Group of America, Incorporated0.45%0.06%0.39%
DINOHF Sinclair Corp0.44%0.06%0.38%
PNFPPinnacle Financial Partners In Common Stock Usd1.00.42%0.06%0.36%
EQHEquitable Hldgs Inc.0.40%0.05%0.35%
UNMUnum Group0.38%0.06%0.32%
DTMDT Midstream Inc0.38%0.06%0.32%

28.9% of PTMC is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

PTMCVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PTMC or VYM?

PTMC has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, PTMC or VYM?

Over the past year PTMC returned +10.30% vs +16.24% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), PTMC annualized +4.92% vs +9.28% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, PTMC or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.0% annualized versus 12.2% for PTMC. Worst drawdown: PTMC -20.5% vs VYM -35.7%.

Should I hold both PTMC and VYM?

PTMC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between PTMC and VYM?

28.9% of PTMC's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 4.2% of VYM's is in holdings PTMC also owns. They hold 136 positions in common, counted across the 398 positions we hold weights for in PTMC and 557 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, PTMC or VYM?

PTMC yields 1.61% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than PTMC?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. PTMC is less concentrated, with 7.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.