IVV vs PULT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF
Which is better, IVV or PULT?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PULT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.25% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $37M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 4.65% |
| Holdings | 508 | 438 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.9% | 0.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -0.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $19,542Best | $11,893 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | - |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 19, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 93 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. IVV has data through Sep 10, 2026 and PULT through Jun 9, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 20, 2023 to Jun 9, 2026 (3.4 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.9% compared with 0.6% for PULT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -0.4% for PULT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PULT charges 0.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $25 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 4.65% for PULT.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.2% of IVV's money is in holdings PULT also owns.
Stated as a floor: for PULT, our book for it covers 69.0% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
The two holdings books were reported 187 days apart, IVV as of Aug 5, 2026 and PULT as of Jan 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
2 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 322 in PULT, against full books of 508 and 438.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and PULT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PULT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PULT charges 0.25%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, IVV or PULT?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.9% annualized versus 0.6% for PULT. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs PULT -0.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and PULT?
IVV and PULT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PULT?
IVV yields 1.06% while PULT yields 4.65%, so PULT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PULT better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.