IVV vs QBER
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QBER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.79% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $73M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 3.29% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 18 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | -0.30% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | -3.47% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 2.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -8.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | TrueShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 28, 2024 |
IVV vs QBER Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER) is a ETF from TrueShares. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while QBER returned -3.47%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a loss of 0.30% for QBER.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 2.5% for QBER. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -8.7% for QBER. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QBER charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 3.29% for QBER.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and QBER share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QBER?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QBER charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QBER?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs -3.47% for QBER, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs -1.68% for QBER. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QBER?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 2.5% for QBER. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QBER -8.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and QBER?
IVV and QBER have a monthly-return correlation of -0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QBER?
IVV and QBER share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QBER?
IVV yields 1.09% while QBER yields 3.29%, so QBER currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.