IVV vs QCMD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QCMD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.00% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $2M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 3.12% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 8 | |
| YTD Return | +13.25% | -13.85% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.95% | -22.20% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.26% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.82% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 61.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -56.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 25, 2025 |
IVV vs QCMD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X ETF (QCMD) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +19.95% while QCMD returned -22.20%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.25% versus a loss of 13.85% for QCMD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QCMD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 61.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -56.0% for QCMD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.76. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QCMD charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $100 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 3.12% for QCMD.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and QCMD share 0 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QCMD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QCMD charges 1.00%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QCMD?
Over the past year IVV returned +19.95% vs -22.20% for QCMD, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.01% vs -21.47% for QCMD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QCMD?
QCMD has been the more volatile fund at 61.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QCMD -56.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and QCMD?
IVV and QCMD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QCMD?
IVV and QCMD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QCMD?
IVV yields 1.10% while QCMD yields 3.12%, so QCMD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.