QCMD vs VYM
QCMD vs VYM
Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCMD | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $2M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.87% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -15.73% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | -31.16% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 62.0% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.0% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
QCMD vs VYM Performance
Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X ETF (QCMD) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QCMD returned -31.16% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, QCMD is down 15.73% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QCMD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 62.0% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.0% for QCMD and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.27. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCMD charges 1.00% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $4 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCMD currently yields 3.87% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
QCMD and VYM share 0 holdings out of 562 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCMD or VYM?
QCMD has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QCMD or VYM?
Over the past year QCMD returned -31.16% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QCMD annualized -23.96% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QCMD or VYM?
QCMD has been the more volatile fund at 62.0% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: QCMD -56.0% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both QCMD and VYM?
QCMD and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.27, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QCMD and VYM?
QCMD and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 562 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCMD or VYM?
QCMD yields 3.87% while VYM yields 2.86%, so QCMD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.