IVV vs QJUN

IVV vs QJUN

Which is better, IVV or QJUN?

Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVQJUN
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.90%
AUM$876.4B$709M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.00%
Holdings50810
YTD Return+12.27%Best+5.38%
1Y Return+17.04%Best+8.63%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.24%Best+14.31%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.08%Best+10.03%
Volatility (annualized)15.6%12.2%Best
Max Drawdown-24.5%-19.9%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$18,490Best$16,127
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendMulti Alternative
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jun 18, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 21, 2021 to Sep 17, 2026 (5.2 years).

IVV vs QJUN growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.2 years both funds cover.

IVV vs QJUN Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June (QJUN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% while QJUN returned +8.63%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.27% versus a gain of 5.38% for QJUN.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.24% per year against +14.31% for QJUN; over five years the annualized figures are +13.08% and +10.03% respectively.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 12.2% for QJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for IVV and -19.9% for QJUN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while QJUN charges 0.90%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $90 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for QJUN.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IVV and QJUN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IVVQJUN

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or QJUN?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QJUN charges 0.90%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $87 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IVV or QJUN?

Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% vs +8.63% for QJUN, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IVV or QJUN?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 12.2% for QJUN. Worst drawdown: IVV -24.5% vs QJUN -19.9%.

Should I hold both IVV and QJUN?

IVV and QJUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QJUN?

IVV yields 1.06% while QJUN yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QJUN better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.