QJUN vs VXUS
QJUN vs VXUS
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QJUN | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $651M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +5.67% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.98% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.55% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.31% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
QJUN vs VXUS Performance
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June (QJUN) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QJUN returned +10.98% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, QJUN is up 5.67% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, QJUN compounded at +14.55% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +10.31% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QJUN has the edge at +10.67% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.3% for QJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.9% for QJUN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QJUN charges 0.90% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $5 annually, a gap of $85 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QJUN currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
QJUN and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QJUN or VXUS?
QJUN has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $85 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QJUN or VXUS?
Over the past year QJUN returned +10.98% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QJUN annualized +10.67% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QJUN or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.3% for QJUN. Worst drawdown: QJUN -19.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both QJUN and VXUS?
QJUN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QJUN and VXUS?
QJUN and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QJUN or VXUS?
QJUN yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.