IVV vs QQQP
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Tradr 2X Long Innovation 100 Quarterly ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QQQP delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QQQP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $16M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 9 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +24.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +43.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 37.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -42.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Tradr ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 30, 2024 |
IVV vs QQQP Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Tradr 2X Long Innovation 100 Quarterly ETF (QQQP) is a ETF from Tradr ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while QQQP returned +43.16%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 24.23% for QQQP.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -42.5% for QQQP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QQQP charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for QQQP.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and QQQP share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QQQP?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QQQP charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QQQP?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +43.16% for QQQP, so QQQP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +35.92% for QQQP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QQQP?
QQQP has been the more volatile fund at 37.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QQQP -42.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and QQQP?
IVV and QQQP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QQQP?
IVV and QQQP share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QQQP?
IVV yields 1.10% while QQQP yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.