IVV vs QSML
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs WisdomTree US SmallCap Quality Growth Fund
Which is better, IVV or QSML?
Large Cap Blend against Small Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, QSML over 1Y. QSML is less concentrated, with 6.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QSML |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.38% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $13M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.52% |
| Holdings | 508 | 391 |
| YTD Return | +12.27% | +14.94%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.04% | +17.51%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.24% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.08% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0%Best | 17.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -28.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.6 years | $16,002Best | $13,392 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 6.7%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Small Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 25, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 25, 2024 to Sep 17, 2026 (2.6 years).
IVV vs QSML growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs QSML Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and WisdomTree US SmallCap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% while QSML returned +17.51%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.27% versus a gain of 14.94% for QSML.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QSML has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.9% compared with 12.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -28.3% for QSML. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QSML charges 0.38%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $38 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.52% for QSML.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 490 holdings in IVV and 375 in QSML, totalling 99.3% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 375 in QSML, against full books of 508 and 391.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 362 positions for QSML that do not appear in our book for IVV (95.1% of the fund), and 482 for IVV that do not appear in QSML (98.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and QSML you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QSML?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QSML charges 0.38%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or QSML?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% vs +17.51% for QSML, so QSML leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or QSML?
QSML has been the more volatile fund at 17.9% annualized versus 12.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs QSML -28.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and QSML?
IVV and QSML have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QSML?
IVV yields 1.06% while QSML yields 0.52%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QSML better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, QSML over 1Y. QSML is less concentrated, with 6.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.