IVV vs RCLO
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF
Which is better, IVV or RCLO?
Large Cap Blend against All Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RCLO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $850.0B | $42M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 6.37% |
| Holdings | 1,018 | 73 |
| YTD Return | +12.12%Best | +3.74% |
| 1Y Return | +12.53%Best | +4.78% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.54% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.93% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8% | 3.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9% | -3.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $11,575Best | $10,541 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Reckoner Capital Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | All Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 22, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 22, 2025 to Nov 11, 2026 (1.1 years).
IVV vs RCLO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RCLO Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF (RCLO) is an ETF from Reckoner Capital Management. Over the past year IVV returned +12.53% while RCLO returned +4.78%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.12% versus a gain of 3.74% for RCLO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.8% compared with 3.9% for RCLO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -3.7% for RCLO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RCLO charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 6.37% for RCLO.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and RCLO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RCLO?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RCLO charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RCLO?
Over the past year IVV returned +12.53% vs +4.78% for RCLO, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +14.22% vs +4.91% for RCLO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RCLO?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.8% annualized versus 3.9% for RCLO. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs RCLO -3.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and RCLO?
IVV and RCLO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RCLO?
IVV yields 1.09% while RCLO yields 6.37%, so RCLO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RCLO better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.