IVV vs RDTL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF
Which is better, IVV or RDTL?
Large Cap Blend against Trading-Leveraged Equity.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RDTL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.50% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $54M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 2 |
| YTD Return | +12.27%Best | -76.16% |
| 1Y Return | +17.04%Best | -83.64% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.24% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.08% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0%Best | 117.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.7%Best | -85.4% |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $13,510Best | $5,155 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | GraniteShares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 25, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 25, 2025 to Sep 17, 2026 (1.5 years).
IVV vs RDTL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RDTL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF (RDTL) is an ETF from GraniteShares. Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% while RDTL returned -83.64%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.27% versus a loss of 76.16% for RDTL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RDTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 117.7% compared with 12.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.7% for IVV and -85.4% for RDTL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RDTL charges 1.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $150 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for RDTL.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and RDTL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RDTL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RDTL charges 1.50%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $147 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RDTL?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% vs -83.64% for RDTL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +22.21% vs -35.71% for RDTL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RDTL?
RDTL has been the more volatile fund at 117.7% annualized versus 12.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -13.7% vs RDTL -85.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and RDTL?
IVV and RDTL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RDTL?
IVV yields 1.06% while RDTL yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RDTL better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.