IVV vs RHRX
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs RH Tactical Rotation ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. RHRX delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RHRX | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.38% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $41M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 8 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +18.21% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +28.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +20.92% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 15.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -25.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Adaptive ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 20, 2012 |
IVV vs RHRX Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) is a ETF from Adaptive ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while RHRX returned +28.17%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 18.21% for RHRX.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +20.92% for RHRX. Across the full 5-year window we track, RHRX has the edge at +8.88% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RHRX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -25.3% for RHRX. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RHRX charges 1.38%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $138 annually, a gap of $135 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for RHRX.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and RHRX share 0 holdings out of 510 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RHRX?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RHRX charges 1.38%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $135 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or RHRX?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +28.17% for RHRX, so RHRX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +8.88% for RHRX. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or RHRX?
RHRX has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RHRX -25.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and RHRX?
IVV and RHRX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RHRX?
IVV and RHRX share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 510 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RHRX?
IVV yields 1.10% while RHRX yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.