IVV vs RKNG

IVV vs RKNG

Which is better, IVV or RKNG?

Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.4%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVRKNG
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.79%
AUM$876.4B$5M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.00%
Holdings50864
YTD Return+12.51%Best-8.42%
1Y Return+17.57%-
3Y Return (annualized)+21.27%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.95%-
Top 10 Weight37.9%Best42.4%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Defiance ETFs, LLC
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendMulti Alternative
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jan 21, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

IVV vs RKNG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs RKNG Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Defiance Retail Kings ETF (RKNG) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC. Year to date, IVV is up 12.51% versus a loss of 8.42% for RKNG.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while RKNG charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for RKNG.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in RKNG7.6%
RKNG already in IVV34.0%

7.6% of IVV's money is in holdings RKNG also owns. 34.0% of RKNG's money is in holdings IVV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

9 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 31 in RKNG, against full books of 508 and 64.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 17 positions for RKNG that do not appear in our book for IVV (49.8% of the fund), and 486 for IVV that do not appear in RKNG (91.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in RKNGDifference
GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.0013.19%3.93%0.74%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.51%4.10%2.59%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc.1.18%3.85%2.67%
DELLDell Technologies Inc.0.20%4.79%4.59%
LITELumentum Holdings Inc0.10%4.07%3.97%
INTCIntel Corp.0.72%3.01%2.29%
VRTVertiv Group Corp0.16%3.55%3.39%
SNDKSandisk Corp/De0.30%3.35%3.05%
WDCWestern Digital Corp.0.27%3.37%3.10%

34.0% of RKNG is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IVVRKNG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or RKNG?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RKNG charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RKNG?

34.0% of RKNG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 34.0% of RKNG's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 31 in RKNG.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RKNG?

IVV yields 1.06% while RKNG yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is RKNG better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.