IVV vs ROBN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | ROBN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.05% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $113M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 8.03% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | -54.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | -65.73% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 145.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -87.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | REX Shares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 31, 2025 |
IVV vs ROBN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) is a ETF from REX Shares. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while ROBN returned -65.73%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a loss of 54.96% for ROBN.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ROBN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 145.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -87.3% for ROBN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while ROBN charges 1.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $105 annually, a gap of $102 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 8.03% for ROBN.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and ROBN share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or ROBN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ROBN charges 1.05%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $102 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or ROBN?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs -65.73% for ROBN, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +3.60% for ROBN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or ROBN?
ROBN has been the more volatile fund at 145.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs ROBN -87.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and ROBN?
IVV and ROBN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and ROBN?
IVV and ROBN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or ROBN?
IVV yields 1.09% while ROBN yields 8.03%, so ROBN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.