ROBN vs VYM
T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ROBN | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $113M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.03% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -55.31% | +16.10% | |
| 1Y Return | -65.73% | +25.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.35% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 145.1% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -87.3% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 31, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
ROBN vs VYM Performance
T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) is a ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ROBN returned -65.73% while VYM returned +25.99%. Year to date, ROBN is down 55.31% versus a gain of 16.10% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ROBN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 145.1% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -87.3% for ROBN and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.19. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ROBN charges 1.05% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $4 annually, a gap of $101 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ROBN currently yields 8.03% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
ROBN and VYM share 0 holdings out of 560 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ROBN or VYM?
ROBN has an expense ratio of 1.05% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $101 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ROBN or VYM?
Over the past year ROBN returned -65.73% vs +25.99% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ROBN annualized +3.08% vs +7.08% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ROBN or VYM?
ROBN has been the more volatile fund at 145.1% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: ROBN -87.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both ROBN and VYM?
ROBN and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.19, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ROBN and VYM?
ROBN and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 560 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ROBN or VYM?
ROBN yields 8.03% while VYM yields 2.86%, so ROBN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.