IVV vs RYSE
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF
Which is better, IVV or RYSE?
Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RYSE |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.94% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.97% |
| Holdings | 508 | 4 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4%Best | 15.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -19.9% |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $15,974Best | $12,110 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | CBOE Vest |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 3, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 174 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. IVV has data through Sep 17, 2026 and RYSE through Mar 27, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 3, 2023 to Mar 27, 2026 (3.1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RYSE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 12.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -19.9% for RYSE. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.40. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RYSE charges 0.94%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $94 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.97% for RYSE.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 490 holdings in IVV and 1 in RYSE, totalling 99.3% and 75.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 213 days apart, IVV as of Aug 31, 2026 and RYSE as of Jan 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 1 in RYSE, against full books of 508 and 4.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and RYSE you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RYSE?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RYSE charges 0.94%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $91 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, IVV or RYSE?
RYSE has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 12.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs RYSE -19.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and RYSE?
IVV and RYSE have a monthly-return correlation of -0.40, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RYSE?
IVV yields 1.06% while RYSE yields 1.97%, so RYSE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RYSE better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.