IVV vs SAGP
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Strategas Global Policy Opportunities ETF
Which is better, IVV or SAGP?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. SAGP is less concentrated, with 22.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SAGP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.65% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $80M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 3.11% |
| Holdings | 508 | 106 |
| YTD Return | +11.57%Best | +5.29% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | +9.44% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71%Best | +14.93% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7% | 14.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.1%Best | -22.9% |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $18,530Best | $15,111 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 22.1%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Strategas Asset Management, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 25, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 25, 2022 to Sep 10, 2026 (4.6 years).
IVV vs SAGP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SAGP Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Strategas Global Policy Opportunities ETF (SAGP) is an ETF from Strategas Asset Management, LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while SAGP returned +9.44%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 5.29% for SAGP.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.71% per year against +14.93% for SAGP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 14.5% for SAGP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.1% for IVV and -22.9% for SAGP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SAGP charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 3.11% for SAGP.
Holdings Overlap
2.2% of IVV's money is in holdings SAGP also owns. 51.0% of SAGP's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
27 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 101 in SAGP, against full books of 508 and 106.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 50 positions for SAGP that do not appear in our book for IVV (10.9% of the fund), and 469 for IVV that do not appear in SAGP (97.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SAGP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 0.55% | 2.35% | 1.80% |
| AXONAxon Enterprise Inc | 0.07% | 2.52% | 2.45% |
| GILDGilead Sciences Inc | 0.25% | 2.12% | 1.87% |
| SWKStanley Black & Decker Inc. | 0.02% | 2.25% | 2.23% |
| LHLabcorp Holdings Inc | 0.04% | 2.15% | 2.11% |
| GDGeneral Dynamics Corp. | 0.15% | 2.01% | 1.86% |
| INCYIncyte Corp. | 0.03% | 2.13% | 2.10% |
| DXCMDexcom Inc. | 0.05% | 2.10% | 2.05% |
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp | 0.18% | 1.96% | 1.78% |
| LDOSLeidos Holdings, Inc | 0.02% | 2.10% | 2.08% |
51.0% of SAGP is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SAGP?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SAGP charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SAGP?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +9.44% for SAGP, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SAGP?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 14.5% for SAGP. Worst drawdown: IVV -22.1% vs SAGP -22.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and SAGP?
IVV and SAGP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SAGP?
51.0% of SAGP's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 51.0% of SAGP's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 101 in SAGP.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SAGP?
IVV yields 1.06% while SAGP yields 3.11%, so SAGP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SAGP better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. SAGP is less concentrated, with 22.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.