IVV vs SAGP
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Strategas Global Policy Opportunities ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SAGP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $81M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 3.17% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 106 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +12.01% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +17.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +17.42% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -22.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Strategas Asset Management, LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 25, 2022 |
IVV vs SAGP Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Strategas Global Policy Opportunities ETF (SAGP) is a ETF from Strategas Asset Management, LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while SAGP returned +17.63%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 12.01% for SAGP.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +17.42% for SAGP. Across the full 5-year window we track, SAGP has the edge at +11.00% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.5% for SAGP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -22.9% for SAGP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SAGP charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 3.17% for SAGP.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SAGP share 26 holdings out of 579 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SAGP?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SAGP charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SAGP?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +17.63% for SAGP, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +11.00% for SAGP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SAGP?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.5% for SAGP. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SAGP -22.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and SAGP?
IVV and SAGP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SAGP?
IVV and SAGP share 26 common holdings with a 2.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 579 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SAGP?
IVV yields 1.10% while SAGP yields 3.17%, so SAGP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.