IVV vs SBTU
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs T-REX 2x Long SBET Daily Target ETF
Which is better, IVV or SBTU?
Large Cap Blend against Trading-Leveraged Equity.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SBTU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.50% |
| AUM | $850.0B | $3M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 1,018 | 6 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8%Best | 1724.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9%Best | -94.2% |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $11,321Best | $9,490 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | REX Shares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 21, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 8 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. IVV has data through Nov 11, 2026 and SBTU through Nov 3, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 21, 2025 to Nov 3, 2026 (1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SBTU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 1724.0% compared with 12.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -94.2% for SBTU. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.16. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SBTU charges 1.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $150 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for SBTU.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 505 holdings in IVV and 1 in SBTU, totalling 100.1% and 2.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 1 in SBTU, against full books of 1,018 and 6.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and SBTU you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SBTU?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SBTU charges 1.50%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $147 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, IVV or SBTU?
SBTU has been the more volatile fund at 1724.0% annualized versus 12.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs SBTU -94.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and SBTU?
IVV and SBTU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.16, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SBTU?
IVV yields 1.09% while SBTU yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SBTU better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.