IVV vs SCC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs ProShares UltraShort Consumer Discretionary
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SCC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $7M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 3.53% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | -4.56% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | -14.40% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | -23.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | -16.06% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 34.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -99.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ProShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 30, 2007 |
IVV vs SCC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares UltraShort Consumer Discretionary (SCC) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while SCC returned -14.40%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a loss of 4.56% for SCC.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.77% per year against -23.83% for SCC; over five years the annualized figures are +13.39% and -16.06% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs -27.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -99.9% for SCC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.86. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SCC charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 3.53% for SCC.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SCC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SCC charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SCC?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs -14.40% for SCC, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs -27.66% for SCC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SCC?
SCC has been the more volatile fund at 34.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SCC -99.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and SCC?
IVV and SCC have a monthly-return correlation of -0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SCC?
IVV yields 1.09% while SCC yields 3.53%, so SCC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.