SCC vs VYM
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Discretionary vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCC | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $7M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.53% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -5.02% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | -15.42% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -23.22% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -16.27% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 34.1% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.9% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2007 | Nov 10, 2006 |
SCC vs VYM Performance
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Discretionary (SCC) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SCC returned -15.42% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, SCC is down 5.02% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, SCC compounded at -23.22% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -16.27% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs -27.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.1% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.9% for SCC and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.76. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCC charges 0.95% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $4 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCC currently yields 3.53% against 2.86% for VYM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCC or VYM?
SCC has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $91 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCC or VYM?
Over the past year SCC returned -15.42% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), SCC annualized -27.69% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCC or VYM?
SCC has been the more volatile fund at 34.1% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: SCC -99.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both SCC and VYM?
SCC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCC or VYM?
SCC yields 3.53% while VYM yields 2.86%, so SCC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.