IVV vs SCOW
IVV vs SCOW
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SCOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.59% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $2M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.38% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 81 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +19.21% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +16.98% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 12.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -10.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Pacer ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 27, 2025 |
IVV vs SCOW Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while SCOW returned +16.98%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 19.21% for SCOW.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.3% for SCOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -10.1% for SCOW. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SCOW charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $59 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.38% for SCOW.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SCOW share 0 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SCOW?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SCOW charges 0.59%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SCOW?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +16.98% for SCOW, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SCOW?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.3% for SCOW. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SCOW -10.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and SCOW?
IVV and SCOW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SCOW?
IVV and SCOW share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SCOW?
IVV yields 1.09% while SCOW yields 0.38%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.