SCOW vs VYM
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCOW | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $2M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.38% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 81 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +20.09% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.84% | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -10.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 27, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
SCOW vs VYM Performance
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SCOW returned +17.84% while VYM returned +24.43%. Year to date, SCOW is up 20.09% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 12.4% for SCOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.1% for SCOW and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCOW charges 0.59% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $4 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCOW currently yields 0.38% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
SCOW and VYM share 1 holdings out of 560 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCOW | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KLIC | 1.49% | 0.02% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCOW or VYM?
SCOW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCOW or VYM?
Over the past year SCOW returned +17.84% vs +24.43% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCOW or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 12.4% for SCOW. Worst drawdown: SCOW -10.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both SCOW and VYM?
SCOW and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SCOW and VYM?
SCOW and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 560 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCOW or VYM?
SCOW yields 0.38% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.