IVV vs SETM
IVV vs SETM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Sprott Critical Materials ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. SETM delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SETM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $522M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.46% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 127 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +8.42% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +64.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | +25.68% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 31.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -41.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Sprott ETFS | |
| Category | Equity | Commodity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 1, 2023 |
IVV vs SETM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) is a ETF from Sprott ETFS. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while SETM returned +64.70%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 8.42% for SETM.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +25.68% for SETM. Across the full 4-year window we track, SETM has the edge at +16.97% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SETM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -41.8% for SETM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SETM charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.46% for SETM.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SETM share 1 holdings out of 627 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SETM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALB | 0.02% | 5.25% | 5.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SETM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SETM charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SETM?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +64.70% for SETM, so SETM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +16.97% for SETM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SETM?
SETM has been the more volatile fund at 31.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SETM -41.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and SETM?
IVV and SETM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SETM?
IVV and SETM share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 627 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SETM?
IVV yields 1.09% while SETM yields 1.46%, so SETM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.