IVV vs SETM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Sprott Critical Materials ETF
Which is better, IVV or SETM?
Large Cap Blend against Energy.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, SETM over 1Y and 3Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SETM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.65% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $613M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.31% |
| Holdings | 508 | 158 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | +2.98% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61% | +37.94%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | +22.90%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4%Best | 32.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -41.8% |
| $10,000 over 3.6 years | $19,128Best | $16,410 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 40.2% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Sprott ETFS |
| Category | Equity | Commodity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Energy |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 1, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 2, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.6 years).
IVV vs SETM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SETM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) is an ETF from Sprott ETFS. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while SETM returned +37.94%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 2.98% for SETM.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.38% per year against +22.90% for SETM. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +19.74% annualized vs +14.75%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SETM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.5% compared with 12.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -41.8% for SETM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SETM charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.31% for SETM.
Holdings Overlap
3.4% of SETM's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
SETM and IVV share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 155 in SETM, against full books of 508 and 158.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 12 positions for SETM that do not appear in our book for IVV (13.3% of the fund), and 481 for IVV that do not appear in SETM (98.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SETM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALBAlbemarle Corp. | 0.02% | 3.35% | 3.33% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and SETM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SETM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SETM charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SETM?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +37.94% for SETM, so SETM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +19.74% vs +14.75% for SETM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SETM?
SETM has been the more volatile fund at 32.5% annualized versus 12.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs SETM -41.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and SETM?
IVV and SETM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SETM?
3.4% of SETM's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 3.4% of SETM's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 155 in SETM.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SETM?
IVV yields 1.06% while SETM yields 1.31%, so SETM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SETM better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, SETM over 1Y and 3Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.