IVV vs SHLD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Global X Defense Tech ETF
Which is better, IVV or SHLD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, SHLD over 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SHLD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $7.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.67% |
| Holdings | 508 | 55 |
| YTD Return | +13.39%Best | -4.89% |
| 1Y Return | +20.08%Best | +2.28% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.29% | +37.66%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.88% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4%Best | 21.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -25.4% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $18,034 | $26,087Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 64.0% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 11, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 13, 2023 to Sep 4, 2026 (3 years).
IVV vs SHLD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SHLD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% while SHLD returned +2.28%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.39% versus a loss of 4.89% for SHLD.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.29% per year against +37.66% for SHLD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SHLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.0% compared with 12.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -25.4% for SHLD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.17. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SHLD charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.67% for SHLD.
Holdings Overlap
1.6% of IVV's money is in holdings SHLD also owns. 51.6% of SHLD's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
8 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 50 in SHLD, against full books of 508 and 55.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 17 positions for SHLD that do not appear in our book for IVV (15.8% of the fund), and 489 for IVV that do not appear in SHLD (97.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SHLD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| RTXRaytheon Co. | 0.45% | 9.50% | 9.05% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 0.55% | 9.17% | 8.62% |
| GDGeneral Dynamics Corp. | 0.15% | 8.67% | 8.52% |
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp | 0.18% | 8.52% | 8.34% |
| NOCNorthrop Grumman Corp. | 0.11% | 7.66% | 7.55% |
| LHXL3Harris Technologies Inc. | 0.08% | 3.96% | 3.88% |
| LDOSLeidos Holdings, Inc. | 0.02% | 2.32% | 2.30% |
| HIIHuntington Ingalls Industries Inc. | 0.02% | 1.80% | 1.78% |
51.6% of SHLD is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SHLD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SHLD charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SHLD?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% vs +2.28% for SHLD, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SHLD?
SHLD has been the more volatile fund at 21.0% annualized versus 12.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs SHLD -25.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and SHLD?
IVV and SHLD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.17, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SHLD?
51.6% of SHLD's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 51.6% of SHLD's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 50 in SHLD.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SHLD?
IVV yields 1.10% while SHLD yields 0.67%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SHLD better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, SHLD over 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.