IVV vs SIL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Global X Silver Miners ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. SIL delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $4.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.38% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 44 | |
| YTD Return | +14.29% | +8.03% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.79% | +68.47% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19% | +54.82% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | +18.99% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 40.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -83.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 19, 2010 |
IVV vs SIL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% while SIL returned +68.47%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.29% versus a gain of 8.03% for SIL.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.19% per year against +54.82% for SIL; over five years the annualized figures are +13.28% and +18.99% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +4.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 40.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -83.4% for SIL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SIL charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.38% for SIL.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SIL share 0 holdings out of 542 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SIL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SIL charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SIL?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% vs +68.47% for SIL, so SIL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IVV annualized +7.06% vs +4.82% for SIL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SIL?
SIL has been the more volatile fund at 40.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SIL -83.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and SIL?
IVV and SIL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SIL?
IVV and SIL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 542 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SIL?
IVV yields 1.10% while SIL yields 1.38%, so SIL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.