IVV vs SILJ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. SILJ delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SILJ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.69% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $3.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.14% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 65 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +7.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +75.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +47.26% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | +17.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 47.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -79.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Amplify ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 28, 2012 |
IVV vs SILJ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while SILJ returned +75.92%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 7.25% for SILJ.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.80% per year against +47.26% for SILJ; over five years the annualized figures are +13.37% and +17.34% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +3.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SILJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 47.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -79.0% for SILJ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SILJ charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $69 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 2.14% for SILJ.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SILJ share 0 holdings out of 572 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SILJ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SILJ charges 0.69%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SILJ?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +75.92% for SILJ, so SILJ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +3.47% for SILJ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SILJ?
SILJ has been the more volatile fund at 47.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SILJ -79.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and SILJ?
IVV and SILJ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SILJ?
IVV and SILJ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 572 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SILJ?
IVV yields 1.09% while SILJ yields 2.14%, so SILJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.