SCHD vs SILJ
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
Which is better, SCHD or SILJ?
Large Cap Value against Small Cap Growth.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over the full window, SILJ over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | SILJ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.69% |
| AUM | $112.2B | $4.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.13% | 2.30% |
| Holdings | 103 | 138 |
| YTD Return | +28.59%Best | +18.00% |
| 1Y Return | +31.77% | +74.42%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.70% | +53.41%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.09% | +19.12%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.0%Best | 48.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4%Best | -79.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,171 | $23,984Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.5%Best | 55.3% |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Amplify ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Small Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Nov 28, 2012 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 29, 2012 to Sep 3, 2026 (13.8 years).
SCHD vs SILJ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 13.8 years both funds cover.
SCHD vs SILJ Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs. Over the past year SCHD returned +31.77% while SILJ returned +74.42%. Year to date, SCHD is up 28.59% versus a gain of 18.00% for SILJ.
Over three years, SCHD compounded at +16.70% per year against +53.41% for SILJ; over five years the annualized figures are +10.09% and +19.12% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.51% annualized vs +4.18%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SILJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 48.0% compared with 14.0% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for SCHD and -79.0% for SILJ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while SILJ charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $69 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.13% against 2.30% for SILJ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 100 holdings in SCHD and 66 in SILJ, totalling 100.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 66 in SILJ, against full books of 103 and 138.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 9 positions for SILJ that do not appear in our book for SCHD (24.2% of the fund), and 99 for SCHD that do not appear in SILJ (99.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SCHD and SILJ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or SILJ?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while SILJ charges 0.69%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $63 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCHD or SILJ?
Over the past year SCHD returned +31.77% vs +74.42% for SILJ, so SILJ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), SCHD annualized +11.51% vs +4.18% for SILJ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCHD or SILJ?
SILJ has been the more volatile fund at 48.0% annualized versus 14.0% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: SCHD -33.4% vs SILJ -79.0%.
Should I hold both SCHD and SILJ?
SCHD and SILJ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or SILJ?
SCHD yields 3.13% while SILJ yields 2.30%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SILJ better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over the full window, SILJ over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.