IVV vs SKHU
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs ProShares Ultra SK hynix ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SKHU | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $94M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 0 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | -40.42% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | - | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | - | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -61.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ProShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 13, 2026 |
IVV vs SKHU Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares Ultra SK hynix ETF (SKHU) is a ETF from ProShares. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a loss of 40.42% for SKHU.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -61.3% for SKHU. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SKHU charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for SKHU.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SKHU?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SKHU charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SKHU?
IVV yields 1.10% while SKHU yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.