IVV vs SLNZ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs TCW Senior Loan ETF
Which is better, IVV or SLNZ?
Large Cap Blend against Bank Loan.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SLNZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.65% |
| AUM | $876.4B | - |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 7.42% |
| Holdings | 508 | 296 |
| YTD Return | +12.27%Best | +3.22% |
| 1Y Return | +17.04%Best | +4.48% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.24% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.08% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7% | 1.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -2.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $13,188Best | $10,946 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | TCW ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Bank Loan |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 28, 2013 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 18, 2024 to Sep 17, 2026 (1.8 years).
IVV vs SLNZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SLNZ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and TCW Senior Loan ETF (SLNZ) is an ETF from TCW ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% while SLNZ returned +4.48%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.27% versus a gain of 3.22% for SLNZ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.7% compared with 1.9% for SLNZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -2.6% for SLNZ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SLNZ charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 7.42% for SLNZ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 490 holdings in IVV and 63 in SLNZ, totalling 99.3% and 31.4% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 63 in SLNZ, against full books of 508 and 296.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and SLNZ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SLNZ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SLNZ charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SLNZ?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% vs +4.48% for SLNZ, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +16.62% vs +5.15% for SLNZ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SLNZ?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.7% annualized versus 1.9% for SLNZ. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs SLNZ -2.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and SLNZ?
IVV and SLNZ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SLNZ?
IVV yields 1.06% while SLNZ yields 7.42%, so SLNZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SLNZ better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.