SLNZ vs VXUS
SLNZ vs VXUS
TCW Senior Loan ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SLNZ | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | - | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.52% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 296 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +2.17% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.22% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -2.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | TCW ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 28, 2013 | Jan 26, 2011 |
SLNZ vs VXUS Performance
TCW Senior Loan ETF (SLNZ) is a ETF from TCW ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SLNZ returned +4.22% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, SLNZ is up 2.17% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 2.0% for SLNZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.6% for SLNZ and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.06. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SLNZ charges 0.65% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $5 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SLNZ currently yields 7.52% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
SLNZ and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7989 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SLNZ or VXUS?
SLNZ has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $60 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SLNZ or VXUS?
Over the past year SLNZ returned +4.22% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), SLNZ annualized +4.87% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SLNZ or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 2.0% for SLNZ. Worst drawdown: SLNZ -2.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both SLNZ and VXUS?
SLNZ and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.06, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SLNZ and VXUS?
SLNZ and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7989 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SLNZ or VXUS?
SLNZ yields 7.52% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so SLNZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.