IVV vs SMAP
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SMAP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $1M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.42% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 57 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +6.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +12.14% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 15.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -24.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Amplify ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 23, 2024 |
IVV vs SMAP Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while SMAP returned +12.14%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 6.50% for SMAP.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 15.0% for SMAP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -24.2% for SMAP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SMAP charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $60 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.42% for SMAP.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SMAP share 12 holdings out of 549 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SMAP?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SMAP charges 0.60%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SMAP?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +12.14% for SMAP, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +5.13% for SMAP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SMAP?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 15.0% for SMAP. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SMAP -24.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and SMAP?
IVV and SMAP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SMAP?
IVV and SMAP share 12 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 549 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SMAP?
IVV yields 1.09% while SMAP yields 0.42%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.