IVV vs SMAP
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
Which is better, IVV or SMAP?
Large Cap Blend against Small Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. SMAP is less concentrated, with 32.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SMAP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.60% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $1M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 508 | 57 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5%Best | 15.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -24.2% |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $13,319Best | $10,833 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 32.8%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Amplify ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 23, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 110 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. IVV has data through Sep 22, 2026 and SMAP through Jun 4, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 23, 2024 to Jun 4, 2026 (1.6 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SMAP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.0% compared with 13.5% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -24.2% for SMAP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SMAP charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $60 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.42% for SMAP.
Holdings Overlap
0.5% of IVV's money is in holdings SMAP also owns. 26.4% of SMAP's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
SMAP and IVV share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 123 days apart, IVV as of Aug 31, 2026 and SMAP as of Apr 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
12 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 56 in SMAP, against full books of 508 and 57.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 42 positions for SMAP that do not appear in our book for IVV (71.4% of the fund), and 470 for IVV that do not appear in SMAP (98.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SMAP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 0.09% | 4.85% | 4.76% |
| CASYCaseys General | 0.04% | 3.69% | 3.65% |
| WSTWest Pharmaceutical Services Inc | 0.04% | 3.55% | 3.51% |
| STLDSteel Dynamics, Inc. | 0.05% | 2.83% | 2.78% |
| ODFLOld Dominion Freig | 0.06% | 2.10% | 2.04% |
| IDXXIdexx Labs | 0.07% | 1.85% | 1.78% |
| NVRNvr Inc. | 0.03% | 1.84% | 1.81% |
| TECHBio-Techne Corp | 0.02% | 1.52% | 1.50% |
| TRMBTrimble Inc. | 0.02% | 1.46% | 1.44% |
| FICOFair Isaac Corp. | 0.04% | 1.14% | 1.10% |
26.4% of SMAP is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SMAP?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SMAP charges 0.60%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, IVV or SMAP?
SMAP has been the more volatile fund at 15.0% annualized versus 13.5% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs SMAP -24.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and SMAP?
IVV and SMAP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SMAP?
26.4% of SMAP's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 26.4% of SMAP's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 56 in SMAP.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SMAP?
IVV yields 1.06% while SMAP yields 0.42%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SMAP better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. SMAP is less concentrated, with 32.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.