IVV vs SMRZ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Global X Small Modular Reactor ETF
Which is better, IVV or SMRZ?
Large Cap Blend against Small Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 98.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SMRZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $850.0B | - |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 1,018 | 11 |
| YTD Return | +12.12%Best | -13.99% |
| 1Y Return | +12.53% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.54% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.93% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.8%Best | 98.0% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 14, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs SMRZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs SMRZ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Global X Small Modular Reactor ETF (SMRZ) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Year to date, IVV is up 12.12% versus a loss of 13.99% for SMRZ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SMRZ charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for SMRZ.
Holdings Overlap
0.4% of IVV's money is in holdings SMRZ also owns. 6.9% of SMRZ's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
SMRZ and IVV share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 11 in SMRZ, against full books of 1,018 and 11.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 9 positions for SMRZ that do not appear in our book for IVV (90.2% of the fund), and 498 for IVV that do not appear in SMRZ (99.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SMRZ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEVGe Vernova | 0.38% | 6.88% | 6.50% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and SMRZ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SMRZ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SMRZ charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SMRZ?
6.9% of SMRZ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 6.9% of SMRZ's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 11 in SMRZ.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SMRZ?
IVV yields 1.09% while SMRZ yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SMRZ better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 98.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.