IVV vs SNOU
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs T-REX 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. SNOU delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SNOU | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.50% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $27M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 6.08% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 3 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +68.75% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +72.07% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 208.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -85.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | REX Shares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 25, 2025 |
IVV vs SNOU Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and T-REX 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF (SNOU) is a ETF from REX Shares. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while SNOU returned +72.07%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 68.75% for SNOU.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SNOU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 208.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -85.0% for SNOU. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SNOU charges 1.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $150 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 6.08% for SNOU.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SNOU share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SNOU?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SNOU charges 1.50%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $147 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SNOU?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +72.07% for SNOU, so SNOU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +93.72% for SNOU. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SNOU?
SNOU has been the more volatile fund at 208.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SNOU -85.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and SNOU?
IVV and SNOU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SNOU?
IVV and SNOU share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SNOU?
IVV yields 1.09% while SNOU yields 6.08%, so SNOU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.