IVV vs SNOY
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. SNOY delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SNOY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.04% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $71M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 64.60% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 16 | |
| YTD Return | +14.29% | +45.92% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.79% | +46.83% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 64.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -50.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | YieldMax ETF | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 10, 2024 |
IVV vs SNOY Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% while SNOY returned +46.83%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.29% versus a gain of 45.92% for SNOY.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SNOY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 64.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -50.9% for SNOY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SNOY charges 1.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $104 annually, a gap of $101 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 64.60% for SNOY.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SNOY share 0 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SNOY?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SNOY charges 1.04%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $101 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SNOY?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% vs +46.83% for SNOY, so SNOY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.06% vs +43.01% for SNOY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SNOY?
SNOY has been the more volatile fund at 64.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SNOY -50.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and SNOY?
IVV and SNOY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SNOY?
IVV and SNOY share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SNOY?
IVV yields 1.10% while SNOY yields 64.60%, so SNOY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.