IVV vs SSK
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs REX-Osprey SOL + Staking ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SSK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.40% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $72M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 33.89% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 6 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | -49.35% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | -63.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 42.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -77.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | REX Shares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 2, 2025 |
IVV vs SSK Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and REX-Osprey SOL + Staking ETF (SSK) is a ETF from REX Shares. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while SSK returned -63.16%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a loss of 49.35% for SSK.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SSK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 42.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -77.3% for SSK. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.29. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SSK charges 1.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $140 annually, a gap of $137 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 33.89% for SSK.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SSK share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SSK?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SSK charges 1.40%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $137 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SSK?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs -63.16% for SSK, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs -55.98% for SSK. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SSK?
SSK has been the more volatile fund at 42.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SSK -77.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and SSK?
IVV and SSK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.29, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SSK?
IVV and SSK share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SSK?
IVV yields 1.09% while SSK yields 33.89%, so SSK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.