IVV vs TACN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF
Which is better, IVV or TACN?
TACN costs less.
TACN has a lower expense ratio. TACN is less concentrated, with 14.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TACN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.00%Best |
| AUM | $876.4B | $25M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 502 |
| YTD Return | +11.51%Best | +11.26% |
| 1Y Return | +15.96% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.01% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.66% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 14.3%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | T.Rowe Price |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 10, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs TACN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs TACN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price. Year to date, IVV is up 11.51% versus a gain of 11.26% for TACN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TACN charges 0.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $0 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for TACN.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings TACN also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 474 in TACN, against full books of 508 and 502.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 11 positions for TACN that do not appear in our book for IVV (1.6% of the fund), and 481 for IVV that do not appear in TACN (98.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in TACN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KRKroger Co. | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and TACN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TACN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TACN charges 0.00%. TACN is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TACN?
IVV yields 1.06% while TACN yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TACN better than IVV?
TACN has a lower expense ratio. TACN is less concentrated, with 14.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.