IVV vs TBFC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TBFC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.44% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $357M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.99% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 28 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +5.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +11.45% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 6.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -10.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Brinsmere Fund | |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 12, 2024 |
IVV vs TBFC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF (TBFC) is a ETF from Brinsmere Fund. Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while TBFC returned +11.45%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 5.19% for TBFC.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 6.6% for TBFC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -10.0% for TBFC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TBFC charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $44 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 2.99% for TBFC.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TBFC share 0 holdings out of 532 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TBFC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TBFC charges 0.44%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TBFC?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +11.45% for TBFC, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +9.29% for TBFC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TBFC?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 6.6% for TBFC. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TBFC -10.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and TBFC?
IVV and TBFC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TBFC?
IVV and TBFC share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 532 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TBFC?
IVV yields 1.09% while TBFC yields 2.99%, so TBFC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.