IVV vs TBFC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF
Which is better, IVV or TBFC?
Large Cap Blend against Equity-oriented Balanced.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 68.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TBFC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.44% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $360M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 26 |
| YTD Return | +13.32%Best | +4.04% |
| 1Y Return | +17.08%Best | +6.77% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.72% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.20% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0% | 6.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -10.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $16,772Best | $12,436 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 68.0% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Brinsmere Fund |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Equity-oriented Balanced |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 12, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 16, 2024 to Sep 23, 2026 (2.7 years).
IVV vs TBFC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
IVV vs TBFC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF (TBFC) is an ETF from Brinsmere Fund. Over the past year IVV returned +17.08% while TBFC returned +6.77%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.32% versus a gain of 4.04% for TBFC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.0% compared with 6.5% for TBFC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -10.0% for TBFC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TBFC charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $44 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 3.00% for TBFC.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 490 holdings in IVV and 25 in TBFC, totalling 99.3% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 25 in TBFC, against full books of 508 and 26.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 490 and 25 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 482 positions TBFC does not, 98.6% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.07%, AAPL 7.02%, MSFT 5.69%, AMZN 3.84%, GOOGL 3.00%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and TBFC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TBFC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TBFC charges 0.44%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or TBFC?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.08% vs +6.77% for TBFC, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or TBFC?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.0% annualized versus 6.5% for TBFC. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs TBFC -10.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and TBFC?
IVV and TBFC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TBFC?
IVV yields 1.06% while TBFC yields 3.00%, so TBFC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TBFC better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 68.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.