IVV vs TBFG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
Which is better, IVV or TBFG?
Large Cap Blend against Allocation/Balanced.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TBFG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.46% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $387M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 2.36% |
| Holdings | 508 | 25 |
| YTD Return | +12.01%Best | +9.25% |
| 1Y Return | +16.48%Best | +13.73% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.21% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0% | 9.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -14.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $16,653Best | $13,793 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 62.9% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Brinsmere Fund |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Allocation/Balanced |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 12, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 16, 2024 to Sep 14, 2026 (2.7 years).
IVV vs TBFG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
IVV vs TBFG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) is an ETF from Brinsmere Fund. Over the past year IVV returned +16.48% while TBFG returned +13.73%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.01% versus a gain of 9.25% for TBFG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.0% compared with 9.2% for TBFG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -14.2% for TBFG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TBFG charges 0.46%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $46 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 2.36% for TBFG.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 490 holdings in IVV and 24 in TBFG, totalling 99.3% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 24 in TBFG, against full books of 508 and 25.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 490 and 24 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 482 positions TBFG does not, 98.6% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.07%, AAPL 7.02%, MSFT 5.69%, AMZN 3.84%, GOOGL 3.00%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and TBFG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TBFG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TBFG charges 0.46%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or TBFG?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.48% vs +13.73% for TBFG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or TBFG?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.0% annualized versus 9.2% for TBFG. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs TBFG -14.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and TBFG?
IVV and TBFG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TBFG?
IVV yields 1.06% while TBFG yields 2.36%, so TBFG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TBFG better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.