IVV vs TDEC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TDEC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $14M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +8.53% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +18.34% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 7.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -10.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 20, 2024 |
IVV vs TDEC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while TDEC returned +18.34%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 8.53% for TDEC.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.9% for TDEC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -10.3% for TDEC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TDEC charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for TDEC.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TDEC share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TDEC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TDEC charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TDEC?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +18.34% for TDEC, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +18.99% for TDEC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TDEC?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.9% for TDEC. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TDEC -10.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and TDEC?
IVV and TDEC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TDEC?
IVV and TDEC share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TDEC?
IVV yields 1.09% while TDEC yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.