IVV vs TDSC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs ETC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TDSC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.90% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $101M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.61% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 11 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +13.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +17.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +11.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | +3.06% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 9.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -21.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | The Cabana Group, LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 16, 2020 |
IVV vs TDSC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ETC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) is a ETF from The Cabana Group, LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while TDSC returned +17.94%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 13.52% for TDSC.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.80% per year against +11.51% for TDSC; over five years the annualized figures are +13.37% and +3.06% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +4.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 9.6% for TDSC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -21.5% for TDSC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TDSC charges 0.90%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $90 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.61% for TDSC.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TDSC share 0 holdings out of 515 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TDSC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TDSC charges 0.90%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TDSC?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +17.94% for TDSC, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +4.32% for TDSC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TDSC?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 9.6% for TDSC. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TDSC -21.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and TDSC?
IVV and TDSC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TDSC?
IVV and TDSC share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 515 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TDSC?
IVV yields 1.09% while TDSC yields 1.61%, so TDSC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.