IVV vs TFJL

IVV vs TFJL
See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVTFJLWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.79%
AUM$907.0B$4M
Dividend Yield1.10%0.00%
Holdings5085
YTD Return+12.71%-5.11%
1Y Return+21.89%-4.83%
3Y Return (annualized)+22.08%-1.16%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.96%-4.63%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%8.4%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-25.4%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Innovator ETFs Trust
CategoryEquityAlternative
InceptionMay 15, 2000Aug 17, 2020

IVV vs TFJL Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while TFJL returned -4.83%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a loss of 5.11% for TFJL.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against -1.16% for TFJL; over five years the annualized figures are +12.96% and -4.63% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.00% annualized vs -4.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 8.4% for TFJL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -25.4% for TFJL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while TFJL charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for TFJL.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or TFJL?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TFJL charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or TFJL?

Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs -4.83% for TFJL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs -4.67% for TFJL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or TFJL?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 8.4% for TFJL. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TFJL -25.4%.

Should I hold both IVV and TFJL?

IVV and TFJL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TFJL?

IVV yields 1.10% while TFJL yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free