IVV vs TNUK
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF
Which is better, IVV or TNUK?
IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TNUK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $1M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 26 |
| YTD Return | +11.57%Best | -8.99% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 63.7% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Tortoise Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 18, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs TNUK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs TNUK Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF (TNUK) is an ETF from Tortoise Capital. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a loss of 8.99% for TNUK.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TNUK charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for TNUK.
Holdings Overlap
0.7% of IVV's money is in holdings TNUK also owns. 18.4% of TNUK's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
TNUK and IVV share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 25 in TNUK, against full books of 508 and 26.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 11 positions for TNUK that do not appear in our book for IVV (42.7% of the fund), and 490 for IVV that do not appear in TNUK (98.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and TNUK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TNUK?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TNUK charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TNUK?
18.4% of TNUK's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 18.4% of TNUK's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 25 in TNUK.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TNUK?
IVV yields 1.06% while TNUK yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TNUK better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.