SCHD vs TNUK
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF
Which is better, SCHD or TNUK?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | TNUK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $112.1B | $1M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 103 | 26 |
| YTD Return | +24.59%Best | -8.99% |
| 1Y Return | +28.14% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.58% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.90% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.8%Best | 63.7% |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Tortoise Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Dec 18, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
SCHD vs TNUK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SCHD vs TNUK Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF (TNUK) is an ETF from Tortoise Capital. Year to date, SCHD is up 24.59% versus a loss of 8.99% for TNUK.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while TNUK charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $75 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.00% against 0.00% for TNUK.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 100 holdings in SCHD and 25 in TNUK, totalling 100.0% and 99.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 25 in TNUK, against full books of 103 and 26.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 16 positions for TNUK that do not appear in our book for SCHD (61.1% of the fund), and 99 for SCHD that do not appear in TNUK (99.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SCHD and TNUK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or TNUK?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while TNUK charges 0.75%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $69 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or TNUK?
SCHD yields 3.00% while TNUK yields 0.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TNUK better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.