IVV vs TOKE
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Cambria Cannabis ETF
Which is better, IVV or TOKE?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TOKE |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.44% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $14M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 508 | 24 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8%Best | 35.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -83.3% |
| $10,000 over 6.7 years | $25,360Best | $2,670 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Cambria Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 25, 2019 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 146 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. IVV has data through Sep 10, 2026 and TOKE through Apr 17, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 6.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 25, 2019 to Apr 17, 2026 (6.7 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TOKE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.5% compared with 16.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -83.3% for TOKE. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TOKE charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $44 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.06% for TOKE.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.6% of IVV's money is in holdings TOKE also owns.
Stated as a floor: for TOKE, our book for it covers 69.9% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
The two holdings books were reported 187 days apart, IVV as of Aug 5, 2026 and TOKE as of Jan 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
2 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 16 in TOKE, against full books of 508 and 24.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and TOKE you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TOKE?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TOKE charges 0.44%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, IVV or TOKE?
TOKE has been the more volatile fund at 35.5% annualized versus 16.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs TOKE -83.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and TOKE?
IVV and TOKE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TOKE?
IVV yields 1.06% while TOKE yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TOKE better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.